ECON2245 - INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT 代寫 verge of failing

  • 100%原創包過,高質代寫&免費提供Turnitin報告--24小時客服QQ&微信:120591129
  • ECON2245 - INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT 代寫 verge of failing

     
    ECON2245 - INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT, SEMESTER 2, 2017
    Purpose of the Assignment
    The purpose of the assignment is to demonstrate both a theoretical and practical
    understanding of a business economics that draws upon several of the topics covered in this
    unit. You should do your own research to discover relevant academic articles to help inform
    your arguments. You will also need to provide evidence to support your claims and
    arguments.
    Assignment Topic
    Identify a business or industry that has recently failed or is on the verge of failing. Using the
    concepts taught in this unit, explain the reasons to why the business (or industry) has
    collapsed or is collapsing. Explain how might other firms learn from your chosen business’s
    (or industry’s) mistakes. You should include evidence to support your answer.
    About the Assignment
    The group assignment has a word limit of 2,500 words (with a 10% leeway for going over
    and under the word limit) and is due on Wednesday 11 th October by 4pm. Students are
    required to submit their assignment through Blackboard. The assignment is worth 30%.
    Assignments should be typed using font size 12 and 1.5 spacing. All references for the
    assignment should be presented in Harvard Style Referencing. Words in the reference list will
    not be counted. You should include a cover page for the assignment.
    Students are required to submit the assignment on or before the due date. Where students do
    not adhere to set deadlines the following policy will apply:
    a)  Extensions will only be considered (although not necessarily approved) if supported in
    writing (if on medical grounds a medical certificate should be presented). Applications
    for extensions must be presented to Student Services.
    b)  The penalty for late submission is 5 percent of the total mark allocated for an
    assessment item per day for the first 7 days (including weekends and public holidays)
    after which the assigned work is not accepted. Each 24-hour block is recorded from the
    time the assignment is due.
    2
    c)  The penalty for exceeding word limit is 1 percent of the total mark allocated for the
    assessment task for each 1 percent in excess of the word limit.
    All assignments will be run through Safe Assign to detect for plagiarism and students will
    receive heavy penalties for plagiarism.
    The assignment will be marked out of 30 whereby up to 10 marks will be allocated to the
    presentation of the assignment and up to 20 marks will be allocated to the analysis of the
    business (or industry) that has failed or is failing.
    Marks for presentation of the assignment will be based on:
    •  How well the assignment is written and structured, is within the word limit and
    uses appropriate grammar.
    •  How well the assignment is referenced and that claims are supported with
    references.
    •  How well the assignment flows, whether it is succinct and is easy to read.
    Marks for the analysis of the business (or industry) that has failed or is failing will be based
    on:
    •  Originality of the chosen business (or industry)
    •  Discussion on the reasons to why the business (or industry) has failed or is failing
    with reference to economic theory.
    •  Evidence of research and understanding of the concepts.
    •  Relevance of the discussion of how other businesses may learn from your chosen
    business’s (or industry’s) mistakes.
    Rubric:
    The following page contains a rubric on the assignment:
    3
    Rubric For the Group Assignment Grade:
    Criteria
    Below and Expected Level
    (mark of less than 50%)
    At an Expected Level
    (mark of 50-75%)
    Above an Expected Level
    (mark of more than 75%)
    How well the assignment is
    written and, is within the word
    limit  and  uses  appropriate
    grammar.
    • Assignment is written poorly
    with points developed with
    minimum detail.
    • Contains poor gramma and
    has weak presentation.
    • Is too long or too short.
    • Assignment is written at an
    acceptable level and the
    student has expressed the
    content in their own terms.
    • Contains an adequate level of
    presentation and has a clear
    purpose.
    • The assignment is within the
    word limits bounds.
    • The assignment is of a high
    standard in terms of the way
    it is written.
    • Information was presented in
    a relevant and well expressed
    manner.
    • Is extremely well polished,
    contains  no  grammatical
    errors  and  is  structured
    appropriately.
    • The assignment is within the
    word limit.
    How well the assignment is
    referenced and that claims are
    supported with references.
    • The  assignment  contains
    material  that  is  not
    referenced correctly.
    • Some content is not in the
    students’ own words.
    • A limited amount statistics
    and claims are supported
    with references.
    • The student has used an
    appropriate reference style
    and there are limited errors in
    the reference list.
    • Explanations are supported
    with appropriate references.
    • There are minimal errors in
    referencing.
    • The student has explained
    concepts in their own terms
    and supported these claims
    with  references
    appropriately.
    • There is no plagiarism or
    paraphrasing  in  the
    assignment.
    How well the assignment flows,
    whether it is succinct and is
    easy to read.
    • The  assignment  is  very
    disjointed.
    • The assignment flows well in
    most parts and it is quite easy
    to read.
    • The  assignment  is  very
    succinct and is very easy to
    read.
    Originality  of  the  chosen
    business
    • The student has chosen the
    most obvious business which
    has recently failed.
    • The student has not provided
    an explanation on the reasons
    for choosing such a business.
    • The student has shown some
    originality in their choice of
    business
    • The student has provided a
    fair explanation to why the
    business is worth analysing.
    • The student has thought
    outside of the box and has
    picked a highly original
    business to analyse.
    • They have also provided a
    relevant explanation to why
    the  business  is  worth
    analysing.
    Discussion on the reasons to
    why the business (industry) has
    failed (or is failing) with
    reference to economic theory.
    • The student has not linked
    the reasons for the business’s
    (or industry’s) failure with
    the  relevant  economic
    theory.
    • Discussion on the economic
    theory  is  vague  and
    misunderstood.
    • The student has done a good
    job at linking the reasons for
    the business’s (or industry’s)
    failure with the relevant
    economic theory.
    • The  student  has  have
    provided a good discussion
    of the economic theory.
    • The student has have shown
    a good understanding of the
    economic theory.
    • The student has provided an
    excellent job at linking the
    reasons for the business’s (or
    industry’s) failure with the
    relevant economic theory.
    • The  student  has  have
    provided  an  outstanding
    discussion of the economic
    theory.
    • The student has have shown
    vast  knowledge  of  the
    relevant economic theory.
    4
    Rubric For the Group Assignment Grade, Continued
    Criteria
    Below and Expected Level
    (mark of less than 50%)
    At an Expected Level
    (mark of 50-75%)
    Above an Expected Level
    (mark of more than 75%)
    Evidence  of  research  and
    understanding of the concepts.
    • Overall,  the  assignment
    displays minimal evidence of
    research  and  an
    understanding  of  the
    concepts.
    • The student has gone to a
    large degree of effort for the
    assignment.
    • The  student  has  display
    sound research skills and an
    understanding of the topic.
    • The assignment is extremely
    well researched.
    • The student has shown an
    excellent understanding of
    core economic theory.
    Relevance of the discussion of
    how other businesses may learn
    from your chosen business’s
    mistakes.
    • Recommendations are weak,
    poorly explained and are
    misunderstood.
    • Recommendations are not
    appropriate for the business
    of analysis.
    • The  assignment  has
    appropriate
    recommendations that are
    consistent with the situation
    for  the  business  and
    economy theory.
    • The student has have shown
    understanding  of  the
    recommendations.
    • The recommendations are
    innovative, valid and show
    good understanding of the
    business of analysis and
    economic theory.
    • The student has have shown
    an excellent understanding of
    the recommendations.
    1
    ECON2245 - INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT, SEMESTER 2, 2017
    Purpose of the Assignment
    The purpose of the assignment is to demonstrate both a theoretical and practical
    understanding of a business economics that draws upon several of the topics covered in this
    unit. You should do your own research to discover relevant academic articles to help inform
    your arguments. You will also need to provide evidence to support your claims and
    arguments.
    Assignment Topic
    Identify a business or industry that has recently failed or is on the verge of failing. Using the
    concepts taught in this unit, explain the reasons to why the business (or industry) has
    collapsed or is collapsing. Explain how might other firms learn from your chosen business’s
    (or industry’s) mistakes. You should include evidence to support your answer.
    About the Assignment
    The group assignment has a word limit of 2,500 words (with a 10% leeway for going over
    and under the word limit) and is due on Wednesday 11 th October by 4pm. Students are
    required to submit their assignment through Blackboard. The assignment is worth 30%.
    Assignments should be typed using font size 12 and 1.5 spacing. All references for the
    assignment should be presented in Harvard Style Referencing. Words in the reference list will
    not be counted. You should include a cover page for the assignment.
    Students are required to submit the assignment on or before the due date. Where students do
    not adhere to set deadlines the following policy will apply:
    a)  Extensions will only be considered (although not necessarily approved) if supported in
    writing (if on medical grounds a medical certificate should be presented). Applications
    for extensions must be presented to Student Services.
    b)  The penalty for late submission is 5 percent of the total mark allocated for an
    assessment item per day for the first 7 days (including weekends and public holidays)
    after which the assigned work is not accepted. Each 24-hour block is recorded from the
    time the assignment is due.
    2
    c)  The penalty for exceeding word limit is 1 percent of the total mark allocated for the
    assessment task for each 1 percent in excess of the word limit.
    All assignments will be run through Safe Assign to detect for plagiarism and students will
    receive heavy penalties for plagiarism.
    The assignment will be marked out of 30 whereby up to 10 marks will be allocated to the
    presentation of the assignment and up to 20 marks will be allocated to the analysis of the
    business (or industry) that has failed or is failing.
    Marks for presentation of the assignment will be based on:
    •  How well the assignment is written and structured, is within the word limit and
    uses appropriate grammar.
    •  How well the assignment is referenced and that claims are supported with
    references.
    •  How well the assignment flows, whether it is succinct and is easy to read.
    Marks for the analysis of the business (or industry) that has failed or is failing will be based
    on:
    •  Originality of the chosen business (or industry)
    •  Discussion on the reasons to why the business (or industry) has failed or is failing
    with reference to economic theory.
    •  Evidence of research and understanding of the concepts.
    •  Relevance of the discussion of how other businesses may learn from your chosen
    business’s (or industry’s) mistakes.
    Rubric:
    The following page contains a rubric on the assignment:
    3
    Rubric For the Group Assignment Grade:
    Criteria
    Below and Expected Level
    (mark of less than 50%)
    At an Expected Level
    (mark of 50-75%)
    Above an Expected Level
    (mark of more than 75%)
    How well the assignment is
    written and, is within the word
    limit  and  uses  appropriate
    grammar.
    • Assignment is written poorly
    with points developed with
    minimum detail.
    • Contains poor gramma and
    has weak presentation.
    • Is too long or too short.
    • Assignment is written at an
    acceptable level and the
    student has expressed the
    content in their own terms.
    • Contains an adequate level of
    presentation and has a clear
    purpose.
    • The assignment is within the
    word limits bounds.
    • The assignment is of a high
    standard in terms of the way
    it is written.
    • Information was presented in
    a relevant and well expressed
    manner.
    • Is extremely well polished,
    contains  no  grammatical
    errors  and  is  structured
    appropriately.
    • The assignment is within the
    word limit.
    How well the assignment is
    referenced and that claims are
    supported with references.
    • The  assignment  contains
    material  that  is  not
    referenced correctly.
    • Some content is not in the
    students’ own words.
    • A limited amount statistics
    and claims are supported
    with references.
    • The student has used an
    appropriate reference style
    and there are limited errors in
    the reference list.
    • Explanations are supported
    with appropriate references.
    • There are minimal errors in
    referencing.
    • The student has explained
    concepts in their own terms
    and supported these claims
    with  references
    appropriately.
    • There is no plagiarism or
    paraphrasing  in  the
    assignment.
    How well the assignment flows,
    whether it is succinct and is
    easy to read.
    • The  assignment  is  very
    disjointed.
    • The assignment flows well in
    most parts and it is quite easy
    to read.
    • The  assignment  is  very
    succinct and is very easy to
    read.
    Originality  of  the  chosen
    business
    • The student has chosen the
    most obvious business which
    has recently failed.
    • The student has not provided
    an explanation on the reasons
    for choosing such a business.
    • The student has shown some
    originality in their choice of
    business
    • The student has provided a
    fair explanation to why the
    business is worth analysing.
    • The student has thought
    outside of the box and has
    picked a highly original
    business to analyse.
    • They have also provided a
    relevant explanation to why
    the  business  is  worth
    analysing.
    Discussion on the reasons to
    why the business (industry) has
    failed (or is failing) with
    reference to economic theory.
    • The student has not linked
    the reasons for the business’s
    (or industry’s) failure with
    the  relevant  economic
    theory.
    • Discussion on the economic
    theory  is  vague  and
    misunderstood.
    • The student has done a good
    job at linking the reasons for
    the business’s (or industry’s)
    failure with the relevant
    economic theory.
    • The  student  has  have
    provided a good discussion
    of the economic theory.
    • The student has have shown
    a good understanding of the
    economic theory.
    • The student has provided an
    excellent job at linking the
    reasons for the business’s (or
    industry’s) failure with the
    relevant economic theory.
    • The  student  has  have
    provided  an  outstanding
    discussion of the economic
    theory.
    • The student has have shown
    vast  knowledge  of  the
    relevant economic theory.
    4
    Rubric For the Group Assignment Grade, Continued
    Criteria
    Below and Expected Level
    (mark of less than 50%)
    At an Expected Level
    (mark of 50-75%)
    Above an Expected Level
    (mark of more than 75%)
    Evidence  of  research  and
    understanding of the concepts.
    • Overall,  the  assignment
    displays minimal evidence of
    research  and  an
    understanding  of  the
    concepts.
    • The student has gone to a
    large degree of effort for the
    assignment.
    • The  student  has  display
    sound research skills and an
    understanding of the topic.
    • The assignment is extremely
    well researched.
    • The student has shown an
    excellent understanding of
    core economic theory.
    Relevance of the discussion of
    how other businesses may learn
    from your chosen business’s
    mistakes.
    • Recommendations are weak,
    poorly explained and are
    misunderstood.
    • Recommendations are not
    appropriate for the business
    of analysis.
    • The  assignment  has
    appropriate
    recommendations that are
    consistent with the situation
    for  the  business  and
    economy theory.
    • The student has have shown
    understanding  of  the
    recommendations.
    • The recommendations are
    innovative, valid and show
    good understanding of the
    business of analysis and
    economic theory.
    • The student has have shown
    an excellent understanding of
    the recommendations.
    1
    ECON2245 - INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT, SEMESTER 2, 2017
    Purpose of the Assignment
    The purpose of the assignment is to demonstrate both a theoretical and practical
    understanding of a business economics that draws upon several of the topics covered in this
    unit. You should do your own research to discover relevant academic articles to help inform
    your arguments. You will also need to provide evidence to support your claims and
    arguments.
    Assignment Topic
    Identify a business or industry that has recently failed or is on the verge of failing. Using the
    concepts taught in this unit, explain the reasons to why the business (or industry) has
    collapsed or is collapsing. Explain how might other firms learn from your chosen business’s
    (or industry’s) mistakes. You should include evidence to support your answer.
    About the Assignment
    The group assignment has a word limit of 2,500 words (with a 10% leeway for going over
    and under the word limit) and is due on Wednesday 11 th October by 4pm. Students are
    required to submit their assignment through Blackboard. The assignment is worth 30%.
    Assignments should be typed using font size 12 and 1.5 spacing. All references for the
    assignment should be presented in Harvard Style Referencing. Words in the reference list will
    not be counted. You should include a cover page for the assignment.
    Students are required to submit the assignment on or before the due date. Where students do
    not adhere to set deadlines the following policy will apply:
    a)  Extensions will only be considered (although not necessarily approved) if supported in
    writing (if on medical grounds a medical certificate should be presented). Applications
    for extensions must be presented to Student Services.
    b)  The penalty for late submission is 5 percent of the total mark allocated for an
    assessment item per day for the first 7 days (including weekends and public holidays)
    after which the assigned work is not accepted. Each 24-hour block is recorded from the
    time the assignment is due.
    2
    c)  The penalty for exceeding word limit is 1 percent of the total mark allocated for the
    assessment task for each 1 percent in excess of the word limit.
    All assignments will be run through Safe Assign to detect for plagiarism and students will
    receive heavy penalties for plagiarism.
    The assignment will be marked out of 30 whereby up to 10 marks will be allocated to the
    presentation of the assignment and up to 20 marks will be allocated to the analysis of the
    business (or industry) that has failed or is failing.
    Marks for presentation of the assignment will be based on:
    •  How well the assignment is written and structured, is within the word limit and
    uses appropriate grammar.
    •  How well the assignment is referenced and that claims are supported with
    references.
    •  How well the assignment flows, whether it is succinct and is easy to read.
    Marks for the analysis of the business (or industry) that has failed or is failing will be based
    on:
    •  Originality of the chosen business (or industry)
    •  Discussion on the reasons to why the business (or industry) has failed or is failing
    with reference to economic theory.

    ECON2245 - INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT 代寫 verge of failing
    •  Evidence of research and understanding of the concepts.
    •  Relevance of the discussion of how other businesses may learn from your chosen
    business’s (or industry’s) mistakes.
    Rubric:
    The following page contains a rubric on the assignment:
    3
    Rubric For the Group Assignment Grade:
    Criteria
    Below and Expected Level
    (mark of less than 50%)
    At an Expected Level
    (mark of 50-75%)
    Above an Expected Level
    (mark of more than 75%)
    How well the assignment is
    written and, is within the word
    limit  and  uses  appropriate
    grammar.
    • Assignment is written poorly
    with points developed with
    minimum detail.
    • Contains poor gramma and
    has weak presentation.
    • Is too long or too short.
    • Assignment is written at an
    acceptable level and the
    student has expressed the
    content in their own terms.
    • Contains an adequate level of
    presentation and has a clear
    purpose.
    • The assignment is within the
    word limits bounds.
    • The assignment is of a high
    standard in terms of the way
    it is written.
    • Information was presented in
    a relevant and well expressed
    manner.
    • Is extremely well polished,
    contains  no  grammatical
    errors  and  is  structured
    appropriately.
    • The assignment is within the
    word limit.
    How well the assignment is
    referenced and that claims are
    supported with references.
    • The  assignment  contains
    material  that  is  not
    referenced correctly.
    • Some content is not in the
    students’ own words.
    • A limited amount statistics
    and claims are supported
    with references.
    • The student has used an
    appropriate reference style
    and there are limited errors in
    the reference list.
    • Explanations are supported
    with appropriate references.
    • There are minimal errors in
    referencing.
    • The student has explained
    concepts in their own terms
    and supported these claims
    with  references
    appropriately.
    • There is no plagiarism or
    paraphrasing  in  the
    assignment.
    How well the assignment flows,
    whether it is succinct and is
    easy to read.
    • The  assignment  is  very
    disjointed.
    • The assignment flows well in
    most parts and it is quite easy
    to read.
    • The  assignment  is  very
    succinct and is very easy to
    read.
    Originality  of  the  chosen
    business
    • The student has chosen the
    most obvious business which
    has recently failed.
    • The student has not provided
    an explanation on the reasons
    for choosing such a business.
    • The student has shown some
    originality in their choice of
    business
    • The student has provided a
    fair explanation to why the
    business is worth analysing.
    • The student has thought
    outside of the box and has
    picked a highly original
    business to analyse.
    • They have also provided a
    relevant explanation to why
    the  business  is  worth
    analysing.
    Discussion on the reasons to
    why the business (industry) has
    failed (or is failing) with
    reference to economic theory.
    • The student has not linked
    the reasons for the business’s
    (or industry’s) failure with
    the  relevant  economic
    theory.
    • Discussion on the economic
    theory  is  vague  and
    misunderstood.
    • The student has done a good
    job at linking the reasons for
    the business’s (or industry’s)
    failure with the relevant
    economic theory.
    • The  student  has  have
    provided a good discussion
    of the economic theory.
    • The student has have shown
    a good understanding of the
    economic theory.
    • The student has provided an
    excellent job at linking the
    reasons for the business’s (or
    industry’s) failure with the
    relevant economic theory.
    • The  student  has  have
    provided  an  outstanding
    discussion of the economic
    theory.
    • The student has have shown
    vast  knowledge  of  the
    relevant economic theory.
    4
    Rubric For the Group Assignment Grade, Continued
    Criteria
    Below and Expected Level
    (mark of less than 50%)
    At an Expected Level
    (mark of 50-75%)
    Above an Expected Level
    (mark of more than 75%)
    Evidence  of  research  and
    understanding of the concepts.
    • Overall,  the  assignment
    displays minimal evidence of
    research  and  an
    understanding  of  the
    concepts.
    • The student has gone to a
    large degree of effort for the
    assignment.
    • The  student  has  display
    sound research skills and an
    understanding of the topic.
    • The assignment is extremely
    well researched.
    • The student has shown an
    excellent understanding of
    core economic theory.
    Relevance of the discussion of
    how other businesses may learn
    from your chosen business’s
    mistakes.
    • Recommendations are weak,
    poorly explained and are
    misunderstood.
    • Recommendations are not
    appropriate for the business
    of analysis.
    • The  assignment  has
    appropriate
    recommendations that are
    consistent with the situation
    for  the  business  and
    economy theory.
    • The student has have shown
    understanding  of  the
    recommendations.
    • The recommendations are
    innovative, valid and show
    good understanding of the
    business of analysis and
    economic theory.
    • The student has have shown
    an excellent understanding of
    the recommendations.
    ECON2245 - INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT 代寫 verge of failing

    在線客服

    售前咨詢
    售后咨詢
    微信號
    Badgeniuscs
    微信

    在線客服

    售前咨詢
    售后咨詢
    微信號
    Badgeniuscs
    微信
    英国代写_数学代写_c++/c代写_留学生代写怎么查出来?